A
Adjudicative facts
defined, § 4.4
Adjudicatory hearings, See, Contested Cases
Administrative courts
tax court, § 2.5
Administrative hearings office, See, Office of Administrative Hearings
Administrative inspections, § 3.4.1. See also Investigative power
consent implied, § 3.4.1
warrantless inspections, § 3.4.1
Administrative law judge recommended decisions, § 11.5
agency review of, § 14.2
collateral estoppel, § 12.1
in contested cases, §§ 4.7.4, 11.5
exceptions to, § 14.1
finality doctrine, § 15.2.1
in rulemaking, §§ 20.3, 20.4, 20.5.2
Administrative law judges, §§ 4.5, 4.6, 11.3
authority, § 11.4
consolidation of contested cases, § 6.3.1
discovery, §§ 8.5.1, 8.5.2, 8.6, 8.7, 9.1
review of ruling, § 8.5.3
disqualification of, § 4.6
ethical code, § 4.5
ex parte contacts, § 4.5
hearing role, § 11.3
motions, § 7.4.1
notice of, § 4.7.1
recommended decision of, §§ 2.5, 4.7.4, 11.5, 20.5.2
role in contested cases, § 11.3
rulemaking role, §§ 20.3, 20.4, 20.5
Administrative Law News, § 2.8
Administrative Law Reports, § 2.5
Administrative notice, § 10.4
Administrative procedure
development in Minnesota, Ch. 1
Administrative subpoena, § 3.5
Advisory rulemaking committee, § 17.1.5
Agency decisions, § 2.5, Ch. 14
administrative law judge recommended decisions, §§ 14.1, 14.2
collateral estoppel, § 12.1
declarative relief, judgment, § 15.3.4
due process, §§ 14.1, 14.2, 14.3
equitable estoppel, § 12.3
ex parte contacts, §§ 14.2, 20.4.3
exceptions to ALJ recommended decision, § 14.1
exhaustion of administrative remedies, § 15.2.2
finality doctrine, § 15.2.1
injunctive relief, § 15.3.4
judicial review, § 14.3; Chs. 15, 24
court of appeals, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(1), 15.3.3(1)
district court, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(2), 15.3.3(1)
notice of facts, § 14.2
oral argument, § 14.1
open meeting law, § 14.2
primary jurisdiction doctrine, § 15.2.3
prohibition, writ of, § 15.3.3(3)
quo warranto, writ of, § 15.3.3(4)
rehearings and reconsiderations, § 14.4
research of, § 2.5
res judicata, § 12.1
ripeness, § 15.2.4
rulemaking, Chs. 16 et seq.
scope of review, § 15.4
arbitrary and capricious, § 15.4.2(6)
bias, § 15.4.2(1)
constitutional issues, § 15.4.2(1)
error of law, § 15.4.2(4)
in excess of authority, § 15.4.2(2)
procedural violations, § 15.4.2(3)
substantial evidence, § 15.4.2(5)
standing, § 15.2.5
stare decisis, § 12.2
Aggrieved party
standing, § 15.2.5
Agriculture, rules affecting, § 17.2.3(3)
Alternative dispute resolution, § 7.3
Appeal, See, Judicial review
Arbitrary and capricious standard, § 15.4.2(6)
Ashbacker doctrine
consolidation, § 6.3.1
Attorney-client privilege, § 9.3.2(2)
Attorney General
rule review authority deleted, § 1.8
Attorney general’s opinions, § 2.6
Attorney work product, § 9.3.3
Attorneys’ fees, § 7.2.3
B
Bifurcation of issues, § 6.3.2
Bill of particulars, § 5.2.2
Bulletins, § 1.3
Burden of proof, § 10.3.1
C
Cameras, § 11.2.2(3)
Case-by-case rulemaking, § 16.5
Certification of motion to agency, § 7.4.1
Certiorari, writ of, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(1), 15.3.3(1)
Chief administrative law judge, §§ 4.5, 4.6, 20.5.2
Code of Federal Regulations, § 2.4
Collateral estoppel. See also Res judicata
administrative proceedings, § 12.1
agency decisions, § 12.1
judicial review, § 12.1
Commissioner of administration
publication of State Register, § 2.3.1
termination of authority to publish rules, § 2.3.2
Commissioner of finance
license fee setting, § 17.2.2(7)
Consolidation of contested cases, § 6.3.1
Contested cases, Chs. 4-15
adjudicative facts, § 4.4
administrative law judges, §§ 4.5, 4.6
agencies as parties, § 6.1
alternative dispute resolution, § 7.3
amendments to procedures, § 1.6
attorneys’ fees, § 7.2.3
bifurcation of issues, § 6.3.2
consolidation, § 6.3.1
constitutional questions, § 11.5
continuances, § 7.1.3
cross-examination, § 10.9
date and time, § 7.1.2
defaults, § 7.5.2
defined, § 4.1
evidence, Ch. 10
hearing, Ch. 11
informal dispositions, § 7.5
intervention, § 6.2
intervention of right, § 6.2.4
joinder, § 6.1.1
judicial review of, Ch. 15
mediation, § 7.3.4
motions, § 7.4.1
nonlawyer representation, § 7.2.2
not public data, § 13.9.3
notice, Ch. 5; § 7.2.1
official record, §§ 10.7, 11.2.2(4) 20.4.3
audio-magnetic recordings, § 11.2.2(4)
transcripts, § 11.2.2(4)
overview, § 4.7
permissive intervention, § 6.2.4
prehearing conferences, §§ 7.3.1, 7.3.2
pro se representation, § 7.2.2
public versus private, § 11.2.2
record, § 11.2.2(4)
right to counsel, § 7.2
scope of review, § 15.4
settlement agreements, § 7.5.1
settlement conferences, § 7.3.3
settlement procedures, §§ 7.3.2, 7.3.3
standing, §§ 6.1, 6.1.2, 6.2.6, 15.2.5
stays, § 7.1.4
stipulations, § 7.5.1
subpoenas, § 7.4.2
venue, § 7.1.1
written testimony, § 10.8
Continuance of hearing, § 7.1.3
Corporations
attorney-client privilege, § 9.3.2(2)
self-incrimination, § 9.4
Counsel, right to, § 7.2
attorneys’ fees, § 7.2.3
limitations on, § 7.2.1
nonlawyer representation, § 7.2.2
pro se representation, § 7.2.2
Court of appeals
certiorari, writ of, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.3(1)
creation, § 1.6
exempt rules, § 20.7
jurisdiction of, § 15.3.1
mandamus, writ of, §§ 15.3.3(2), 24.3
preenforcement challenge to rules, §§ 24.3, 24.6
prohibition, writ of, § 15.3.3(3)
review of agency decisions, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(1)
scope of review, § 15.4
D
Data Practices Act, Ch. 13
accuracy and completeness of data, § 13.6
discovery, §§ 8.5.1, 9.3.4, 13.8
investigative data, § 3.8
notice of hearing, § 5.2.4
public hearings, § 11.2.2(2)
subpoenas, § 7.4.2
Tennessen warning, § 13.6
violations, § 13.8
Decisions. See Agency decisions
Declaratory relief, judgment, § 15.3.4
Default judgment, § 7.5.2
notice of hearing, § 5.3
Defects in rules, §§ 19.4, 20.5.2, 21.3.5
Delegation
by agencies in rulemaking, § 23.5
Disapproval of rules, §§ 19.4, 20.5.2, 21.3.4
Discipline, § 11.5
authority for, § 8.2
constitutional issues, § 9.5
discretionary, § 8.5
government entities, § 9.3.4
interlocutory review, § 8.5.3
matter of right, § 8.4
not public data, § 13.9
prefiled testimony, § 8.5.1
privacy issues, § 9.9
privileges, §§ 8.4, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4
review of ruling, § 8.5.3
sanctions, § 8.7
scope of, § 9.2
Discretion, unbridled, §23.4
Discriminatory enforcement, § 3.6
Disqualification of administrative law judge, § 4.6
District court
certiorari, writ of, § 15.3.3(1)
mandamus, writ of, § 15.3.3(2)
prohibition, writ of, § 15.3.3(3)
quo warranto, writ of, § 15.3.3(4)
review of agency decisions, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(2)
scope of review, § 15.4
Dual notice rulemaking, § 19.3.3
created, § 1.5
Due process
agency decisions, §§ 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 15.4.2(1)
right to counsel, § 7.2
E
Entrapment, § 3.4.2
Equal Access to Justice Act, § 7.2.3
Equitable estoppel
agency decisions, § 12.3
laches, § 12.4
sovereign/proprietary distinction, §§ 12.3, 12.4
Estoppel. See Equitable estoppel or Collateral estoppel
Evidence, Ch. 10
administrative notice, § 10.4
burden of proof, § 10.3.1
cross-examination, § 10.9
exclusionary rule, §§ 10.5, 10.10
exclusiveness of record, § 10.7
offer of proof, § 10.6
official notice, § 10.4
record, § 10.7
residuum rule, § 10.2
rules of evidence, § 10.1, 10.5
standard of proof, § 10.3.2
Ex parte contacts
administrative law judges, § 4.5
agency decision makers, § 14.2
in rulemaking, § 20.4.3
Exclusionary rule, §§ 10.5, 10.10
Executive orders
research, § 2.1
Exempt rules, Ch. 21
creation, § 1.8
Exhaustion of administrative remedies, §§ 15.2, 15.2.2
exceptions to, § 15.2.2
injunctive relief, § 15.3.4
standing, § 15.2.5
stays of agency proceedings, §§ 7.1.4,
Expedited rules, § 21.6
created, § 1.9
Extraordinary writs, § 15.3.3
See also Certiorari; Mandamus Prohibition; Quo Warranto
preenforcement challenge to rules, Ch. 24
F
Farming, rules affecting, § 17.2.3(3)
Federal Register, § 2.4
Fee setting by rulemaking, §§ 17.2.2(7), 19.3
Fifth amendment, §§ 3.4.2, 3.5, 9.4
Final argument, § 11.2.1
Finality doctrine, § 15.2.1
injunctive relief, § 15.3.4
Findings of fact
by administrative law judge, § 11.5
by agency, § 14.3
Fourth amendment, §§ 3.4.1, 3.5,10.10
G
Game and fish rules, § 1.5
Good cause exemption, § 21.2
creation, § 1.8
Gratuitous hearing, § 4.2
Guidebook to State Agency Services, § 2.2
H
Harmless error, §§ 19.4, 20.5.2
doctrine created, § 1.5
Hearing examiner. § 1.3 See Administrative law judges
Hearings
cameras, § 11.2.2(3)
constitutional right, § 4.3
contractual right, § 4.2
date and time, § 7.1.2
entitlement to, § 4.3
intervention in, § 6.2
not public data, § 13.9.3
notice, Ch. 5
property interest, §§ 4.3, 4.4
public proceeding, § 11.2.2
by statute or rule, § 4.2
venue, § 7.1.1
Hearsay evidence, §§ 10.1, 10.2, 10.5
History of Administrative Procedure Act,
Ch. 1
I
Immunity of administrative law judge, § 4.5
Impartiality of administrative law judge, §§ 4.6, 11.3
Initiation of contested case, § 4.7.1
Injunctive relief, § 15.3.4
discovery, § 8.5.3
exhaustion of administrative remedies, § 15.3.4
finality doctrine, § 15.3.4
stays of agency proceeding, § 7.1.4
Injury in fact
Inspection of premises, § 3.4.1
Interpretative rules, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 16.3.2, 23.2.4
Interrogatories, § 8.5.1
Intervention, § 6.2
adequacy of representation, § 6.2.3
agency as representing public interest, §§ 6.2.3, 6.2.6
economic interest, §§ 6.2.3, 6.2.6
hearing, § 6.2.2
petition to intervene, §§ 6.2.1,
intervention of right, §§ 6.2.4, 6.2.5
objection to, § 6.2.2
permissive intervention, § 6.2.4
scope of, § 6.2.7
Investigative power, Ch. 3
due process requirements, §§ 3.3, 3.7
investigative hearings, § 3.4.2
investigative subpoenas, § 3.5
privileges, § 9.3.4(4)
submission of reports, § 3.4.2
warrantless inspections, § 3.4.1
Investigative subpoenas, § 3.5
J
Joinder, § 6.1.1
Judicial notice, § 10.4. See also Official notice
Judicial review, Ch. 15, Ch. 24
certiorari, writ of, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(1), 15.3.3(1)
collateral estoppel, § 12.1
of contested cases, Ch. 15
by court of appeals, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(1)
declaratory relief, judgment, §§ 15.3.4, 24.3
in district court, §§ 15.3.1, 15.3.2(2)
exempt rules, § 21.7
exhaustion of administrative remedies, § 15.2.2
finality doctrine, § 15.2.1
injunctive relief, §§ 15.3.4, 24.12
mandamus, § 15.3.3(2)
policy statements, § 16.4.1
preenforcement challenge of rules, Ch. 24
agency authority, in excess of, § 24.9
by collateral attack, § 24.12
constitutionality, § 24.8
in contested cases, § 24.12
discovery, § 24.7
parties, § 24.4
perfecting an appeal, § 24.5
petition for declaratory judgment, § 24.3
procedural violations, § 24.9
record, § 24.6
scope of review, §§ 24.10, 24.11
standing, § 24.2
procedures for obtaining, § 15.3.1
quo warranto, writ of, § 15.3.3(4)
rehearing and reconsideration by agency, § 14.4
res judicata, § 12.1
ripeness, § 15.2.4
of rules, Ch. 24
scope of review, §§ 15.4, 24.10
agency authority, in excess of, § 15.4.2(2)
arbitrary and capricious, §§ 15.4.2(6), 24.10
constitutional issues, § 15.4.2(1)
error of law, § 15.4.2(4)
in preenforcement challenge of rules, §§ 24.10, 24.11
procedural violations, § 15.4.2(3)
substantial evidence, § 15.4.2(5)
L
equitable estoppel, § 12.4
statutes of limitation, § 12.4
Law of the case, § 12.2
Laws 1975, chapter 380
effect on Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, § 1.4
Laws 1977, chapter 443
provided for less restrictive rulemaking procedures, § 1.5
Laws 1980, chapter 615
“noncontroversial” rulemaking, § 1.5
Laws 1995, chapter 233
rulemaking procedure changed, §1.8
Legislative Auditor rulemaking report, § 1.7
Legislative Commission to Review Administrative Rules (LCRAR), Ch. 25
abolished, § 1.8
constitutionality, § 25.4
created 1974, § 1.4
suspends first rules, § 1.9
Legislative Coordinating Commission Ch 25
ex parte communications, § 25.3.2(2)
organization, § 25.2
preliminary assessment hearings, § 25.3.2(2)
public hearings, § 25.3.3
review of exemptions, § 25.5.1
rule review process, § 25.3
authority assumed, §§ 1.8, 1.9
statutory authority, § 25.2
Legislative facts, § 4.4
official notice, § 10.4
Legislative research, § 2.7
Legislative Manual, § 2.2
Legislative rules, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 23.2.2
License fee setting
commissioner of finance approval, § 17.2.2(7)
Location of hearing, § 7.1.1
Looseleaf publications
Commerce Clearing House and Prentice Hall tax looseleaf services, § 2.5
Manual of State Agency Rules, § 2.3.2
Minnesota Code of Agency Rules (MCAR), §§ 2.3.2, 18.4
Minnesota State Regulations, § 2.3.2
M
Mandamus, writ of, § 15.3.3(2)
discovery, § 8.5.3
initiation of contested cases, § 4.7.1
Mediation of disputes, §§ 7.3.2, 7.3.4, 17.1.3
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Ch. 13, See Data Practices Act
Minnesota Legal Register
attorney general opinions, § 2.6
Minnesota Rules, §§ 2.3.1, 18.4
Minnesota Rules Drafting Manual, §§ 2.3.3,18.2
Minnesota State Documents Center
administrative decisions, § 2.5
attorney general opinions, § 2.6
Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 2.6
Model State Administrative Procedure Act, § 1.8
Motions, § 7.4.1
Motion in limine, §§ 7.4.1, 10.10
N
Necessary parties, § 6.1.1
Need and reasonableness of rules, Ch. 22
first adopted, § 1.4
Negotiated rulemaking, §§ 17.1.3, 19.3.2
Newsletters
Administrative Law News, § 2.5
Administrative Law Reports, § 2.5
Noncontroversial rulemaking, Ch. 19
created, § 1.5
Nonparty participation, §6.1.2
Notice, contested cases, Ch. 5
bill of particulars, motion for, § 5.2.2
continuances, § 7.1.3
default judgment, § 5.3
due process, §§ 5.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3
more definite statement, motion for, § 5.2.2
OAH rules?contested case
requirements, §§ 5.1, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.3
parties, § 6.1
publication, § 5.3
timeliness, § 5.3
Notice, rulemaking, §§ 19.3.1, 20.3.2
additional notice, § 17.2.2(9)
deficiency § 1.7
notice plan, § 17.2.2(9)
strengthened, § 1.8
Notice of and order for hearing, §§ 5.2, 5.3
Notice of appearance, § 5.2.4
Notice of intent to solicit outside opinion, § 17.1.4
Nursing homes
rulemaking by commissioner of health, §§ 17.2.3(2)
O
Offer of proof, § 10.6
Office of administrative hearings, § 4.5
code of professional responsibilities, § 4.5
creation, § 1.4
contested case hearings, Ch. 11
discovery, Ch. 8
ex parte contacts, §§ 4.5, 20.4.3
hearing procedure, § 11.2.1
official notice, § 10.4
prehearing conferences, § 7.3.1
right of cross-examination, § 10.9
settlement agreements, § 7.5.1
subpoenas, § 7.4.2
substantial difference, § 22.3
written testimony, § 10.8
Office of hearing examiners. See also Office of Administrative Hearingsrenamed office of administrative hearings, § 1.7
Official record
contested cases, §§ 10.7
rulemaking, § 20.4.3
Opening statement, § 11.2.1
OSHA inspections, § 3.4.1
P
Parties to a contested case, § 6.1
Petition for adoption of rule, § 17.1.2
Petition for declaratory judgment, § 24.3
Policy statements, § 16.4.1
Policymaking
by adjudication, § 16.5
Administrative Procedure Act, § 16.4
by bulletins, § 16.4.1
as illegal rulemaking, § 16.4
inconsistency with adopted rules, § 16.4.2(2)
lack of public input, § 16.4.2(3)
policy statements, § 16.4.1
Pollution control agency
rulemaking, §§ 17.2.3(1)
Prefiled testimony, § 10.8
Prehearing conferences, § 7.3
issue identification, § 7.3.1
prehearing statement, § 7.3.1
settlement, § 7.3.2
telephone conferences, § 7.3.1
Primary jurisdiction doctrine, § 15.2.3
standing, § 15.2.5
stays, § 7.1.4
Private attorneys general
Private hearings, § 11.2.2(2)
Privileges
contested cases, § 9.3
Pro se representation, § 7.2.2
Procedural rules, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 23.2.3
Prohibition, writ of, § 15.3.3(3)
Proprietary data, § 9.6
Prosecutorial discretion, § 3.6
Protective order, § 9.8
Public ditch proceedings
res judicata, § 12.1
Q
Quo warranto, writ of, § 15.3.3(4)
R
Reasonableness of rules, §§ 22.2, 23.7
Rehearings and reconsiderations, § 14.4
finality doctrine, § 15.2.1
Request for admissions, § 8.4
Res judicata
administrative proceedings, § 12.1
agency decisions, § 12.1
judicial review, § 12.1
public ditch proceedings, § 12.1
Research of administrative law, Ch. 2
agency decisions, § 2.5
Minnesota Rules, § 2.3
Residuum rule, § 10.2
Retroactivity of rules, § 23.6
Revisor of statutes, Ch. 18; §§ 1.5,19.4,
form approval, §§ 18.3, 20.3.1
Minnesota Rules Drafting Manual, §§ 2.3.3, 18.2
publication of rules, §§ 2.3.1, 18.4
rulemaking role created, § 1.5
Right to counsel, § 7.2
Ripeness, § 15.2.4
standing, § 15.2.5
Rulemaking, Chs. 16 et seq.
by adjudication, § 16.5
administrative law judge, §§ 20.3, 20.4
recommended decision, § 20.5.2
advisory committees, § 17.1.5
agency failure to follow APA directives, § 1.3
agency findings of fact, §§ 19.4, 20.5.3
authority for, §23.2
chief ALJ review, § 20.5.2
codification of laws governing, § 1.5
consistency in, § 1.3
constitutionality of rules, §§ 23.8, 24.8
consultation with agency staff, § 17.1.3
controversial rulemaking (with hearing), §§ 16.2, 19.2, Ch. 20; § 22.1
delegation of agency power, §§ 23.5, 24.8
docket, § 17.1.3
created, § 1.8
recommended, § 1.7
drafting, Ch. 18; §19.3
drafting aids, § 18.2
Minnesota Rules Drafting Manual, §§ 2.3.3, 18.2
ex parte communications, § 20.4.3
exempt rulemaking, § 16.2; Ch. 21
authority for adoption, § 21.2
judicial review, § 21.7
procedure, § 21.3
expedited rules, § 21.6
fee setting, § 17.2.2(7)
filing and publication, §§ 19.5, 20.5.4, 21.3.6
formal rulemaking, § 19.2; Ch. 20
with hearing. See Rulemaking, controversial rulemaking
without hearing. See Rulemaking,
noncontroversial rulemaking
good cause exemption, § 21.2
harmless error, §§ 19.4, 20.5.2
hearing, § 20.4
illegal or improper rulemaking, § 16.4
guidelines, § 16.4.1
independent hearings officers, § 1.3
informal rulemaking, § 19.2
injury-in-fact to obtain judicial review, § 24.2
judicial review, Ch. 24
Laws 1975—revisions in procedure, § 1.6
Laws 1977—less restrictive procedures, § 1.5
Laws 1980—noncontroversial§ rulemaking, § 1.5
Laws 1983—revisor of statutes responsibilities clarified, § 1.5
Laws 1995—procedure changed, § 1.8
legality, Ch. 23
Legislative Commission to Review Administrative Rules, Ch. 25
Legislative Coordinating Commission, Ch 25
license fee setting, § 17.2.2(7)
Minnesota Rules, §§ 2.3.2,18.4
need and reasonableness, §§ 22.1-4, 23.7
negotiated rulemaking, §§ 17.1.3, 19.3.2
noncontroversial rulemaking (without hearing), § 16.2; Ch. 19; § 20.1
notice and comment rulemaking, § 19.2
notice of intent to solicit outside opinion, § 17.1.4
notice plan, § 17.2.2(9)
nursing homes, § 17.2.3(2)
petition to adopt, § 17.1.2
policymaking as, § 16.4
policy statements, § 16.4.1
pollution control agency, § 17.2.3.(1)
preenforcement challenge. See Judicial review
procedural requirements, § 23.3
public participation in, §§ 17.1, 17.1.1, 17.1.3, 17.1.4, 20.2, 20.4.1(3), 20.4.2
by petition, § 17.1.2
solicitation of outside opinion, §§ 17.1.4, 20.2
publication. See State Register
quasi-legislative activity, § 1.3
reasonableness, §§ 22.1-4, 23.7
record, §§ 20.4.3, 20.5.5, 24.6, 24.12
regulatory analysis, § 17.2.2
request for comments, § 17.1.4
review for legality, Ch. 23, §§ 19.4, 20.5.2, 21.3.4
revisor of statutes; Ch. 18; §§ 19.4, 19.5, 20.5.3
drafting services, § 18.2
form approval, § 18.3
statement of need and reasonableness, §§ 17.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.3.1, 20.4.1(1), 20.4.2; 22.1
statutory authority for; § 23.2
legislative rules, § 23.2.2
substantial difference, §§ 20.5.2, 22.3
unbridled discretion doctrine, § 23.4
with a hearing, Ch. 20
without a hearing, Ch 19
withdrawl, § 20.5.2
written comments, §§ 19.3.1, 20.5.1
Rulemaking in Minnesota: A Guide, §§ 2.3.3, 18.2
Rules, Ch. 16
definition, § 16.1
definitions under 1957 act, § 1.3
exempt, Ch. 21
filing, §§ 2.3.1, 19.4, 20.5.4, 21.3.6
guidelines § 16.4.1
history of publication, § 2.3.2
legal effect, § 16.3.1
policy statements as, § 16.4.1
publication, § 2.3.1
research, §§ 2.3
retroactivity, §§ 16.3.5, 16.5, 23.6
substantive, § 23.2.2
types of, § 16.2
interpretative, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 16.3.2, 16.4.2, 23.2.4
legislative, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 16.4.2, 23.2.2
procedural, §§ 16.2, 16.3, 23.2.3
Rules of civil procedure, § 8.5.1
Rules of evidence, § 10.1
S
Sanctions, §§ 7.4.2, 7.5.2, 8.4, 8.7
Scope of judicial review
agency decisions, Ch. 15
arbitrary and capricious, § 15.4.2(6)
constitutional issues, §§ 15.4.2(1), 24.8
contested cases, § 15.4
error of law, § 15.4.2(4)
excess of authority, §§ 15.4.2(2), 24.9
in preenforcement challenges to rules, § 24.10
procedural violations, §§ 15.4.2(3), 24.9
rulemaking, § 24.10
substantial evidence, § 15.4.2(5)
Search and seizure, §§ 3.4, 3.5, 10.10
Secretary of state, § 2.3.2
Self-incrimination, §§ 3.5, 9.4
Selective enforcement, § 3.6
Separation of powers, § 25.4
Settlement conference, § 7.3.3
Settlements, §§ 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.5.1
Shepard’s Minnesota Citations, § 2.6
Standard of proof, § 10.3.2
Standards
requirement in delegation of authority, § 23.4
Standing
aggrieved party, § 15.2.5
contested case review, § 15.2.5
public interest, § 6.2.3
rule review, § 24.2
Stare decisis
agency decisions, § 12.2
policymaking, § 16.5.1
State Administrative Rule Making, § 2.8
State ethical practices board, § 2.5
State Register
adopted rules publication, §§ 2.3.1, 18.3, 19.5, 20.5.4, 21.3.6
creation, § 1.4
official notices, § 2.3.1
proposed rules publication, §§ 2.3.1, 19.3.1, 20.3.2, 21.3.5
Statement of need and reasonableness (SONAR), §§ 17.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.3.1, 20.4.1(1), 20.4.2; 22.1. See also Rulemaking
additional notice, § 17.2.2(9)
commissioner of finance
approval for fee setting, § 17.2.2(7)
performance based regulation, § 17.2.2(8)
pollution control agency, §§ 17.2.3(1)
research use, § 2.7
required information, § 17.2.2
Statutes of limitation
laches, § 12.4
Statutory authority for rules, § 23.2
Subpoena
agency investigative, § 3.5
in contested cases, § 7.4.2
Substantial difference, §§ 1.7, 22.5
Substantial evidence rule, §§ 10.2, 15.4.2(5)
Substantive rules, § 23.2.2
Summary disposition, § 7.4.1
Supreme Court
preenforcement challenges to rules, § 24.11
prohibition, writ of, § 15.3.3(3)
quo warranto, writ of, § 15.3.3(4)
scope of review, §§ 15.4.1, 24.11
T
Tax court
commissioner of revenue, § 2.5
decisions, § 2.5
Telephone conferences
prehearing conferences, § 7.3.1
settlement conferences, § 7.3.3
Tennessen warning, § 13.6
Trade secrets, § 9.6
Transcripts, § 11.2.2(4)
Treatises, § 2.8
U
Unauthorized practice of law, § 7.2.2
Unbridled discretion doctrine, § 23.4
V
Venue, § 5.2.1
W
Witness list, §8.4
Work product, § 9.3.3
Workers’ compensation cases, § 2.5
Workers’ compensation court of appeals, § 2.5
Written testimony, § 10.8
Writs, § 15.3.3