{"id":1056,"date":"2018-11-26T13:27:44","date_gmt":"2018-11-26T19:27:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/?p=1056"},"modified":"2019-10-21T15:10:19","modified_gmt":"2019-10-21T20:10:19","slug":"bridges-v-state-ind-ct-app-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2018\/11\/26\/bridges-v-state-ind-ct-app-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Bridges v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"introduction-wrapper\">\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">Bridges v. State, 109 N.E.3d 453 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)E<\/h2>\n<p><strong><strong>Nature of Case: <\/strong><\/strong> Appellant was convicted of failing to register as a sex offender in Indiana and moved to dismiss in the trial court, alleging that subsequent changes to state law requiring tolling of registration periods during incarceration violated Ex Post Facto prohibitions.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>\nHolding:\u00a0<\/strong> Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed trial court&#8217;s denial of motion to dismiss. Tolling provisions did not violate Ex Post Facto prohibitions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>Case Documents<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"default\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2018\/11\/Indiana-Court-of-Appeals-Opinion.pdf\">Indiana Court of Appeals Opinion<\/a>\u00a0| view via <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=5684756433414025098&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;as_sdt=4000006&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholaralrt&amp;hist=dzTKkIsAAAAJ:4548515027500177863:AAGBfm2JqWl9YhGWFd0GFhpIF2HIBNAurw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Google Scholar<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2018\/11\/Appellants-Brief-3.pdf\">Appellant&#8217;s Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2018\/11\/Appellees-Brief-3.pdf\">Appellee&#8217;s Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>News and Related Materials<\/em><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Indiana Court of Appeals affirming trial court denial of motion to dismiss failure to register indictment alleging that provisions of Indiana state law that required tolling of registration requirements during periods of incarceration violated Ex Post Facto provisions. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2018\/11\/26\/bridges-v-state-ind-ct-app-2018\/\" class=\"more-link\">Bridges v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":836,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[84,36,124,125],"class_list":{"0":"post-1056","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-sorn-cases","7":"tag-7th-cir","8":"tag-ex-post-facto","9":"tag-indiana","10":"tag-tolling","11":"entry"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/836"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}