{"id":167,"date":"2017-07-26T09:03:30","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T14:03:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/?page_id=167"},"modified":"2018-09-25T13:36:42","modified_gmt":"2018-09-25T18:36:42","slug":"doe-v-city-of-albuquerque-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2017\/07\/26\/doe-v-city-of-albuquerque-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Doe v. City of Albuquerque (10th Cir. 2010)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"introduction-wrapper\">\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">Doe v. City of Albuquerque, 667 F.3d 1111 (10th Cir. 2012)<\/h2>\n<p><strong><strong>Nature of Case: <\/strong><\/strong> Plaintiff, person required to register, filed suit challenging constitutionality of New Mexico statute prohibiting people on the registry from entering libraries. Government failed to show that law was sufficiently narrowly tailored, or that it constituted a permissible time, place, or manner restriction. Government appealed.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>\nHolding: <\/strong> 10th Circuit affirmed, holding that because government failed to introduce any evidence, it was bound to affirm the decision.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>Case Documents<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"default\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Doe-v-albuquerque-10th-circuit-opinion.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10th Circuit Opinion<\/a> | view via <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=9242982008945188244&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4000005&amp;sciodt=4000006\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Scholar<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Appellants-Brief-5.pdf\">Appellant&#8217;s Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Appellees-Brief-3.pdf\">Appellee&#8217;s Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Reply-Brief.pdf\">Reply Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>News and Related Materials<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"default\">\n<li>[PLN] &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.prisonlegalnews.org\/news\/2012\/jun\/15\/tenth-circuit-voids-albuquerques-attempt-to-ban-sex-offenders-from-libraries\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tenth Circuit Voids Albuquerque\u2019s Attempt to Ban Sex Offenders from Libraries<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>10th Circuit decision affirming district court&#8217;s determination that because government failed to introduce evidence on the point, law forbidding people on the registry from entering libraries was unconstitutional under the First Amendment. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2017\/07\/26\/doe-v-city-of-albuquerque-2010\/\" class=\"more-link\">Doe v. City of Albuquerque (10th Cir. 2010)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":242,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[112,14,53],"class_list":{"0":"post-167","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-residency-cases","7":"tag-10th-cir","8":"tag-1st-amendment","9":"tag-presence-restrictions","10":"entry"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/242"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}