{"id":218,"date":"2017-07-26T10:06:39","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T15:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/?page_id=218"},"modified":"2019-10-21T15:58:48","modified_gmt":"2019-10-21T20:58:48","slug":"u-s-v-kedobeaux-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2017\/07\/26\/u-s-v-kedobeaux-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. v. Kebodeaux (US 2013)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"introduction-wrapper\">\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">United States v. Kebodeaux, 133 S.Ct. 2496 (US 2013)<\/h2>\n<p><strong><strong>Nature of Case: <\/strong><\/strong> Defendant was convicted in federal court for failing to register under SORNA after an intra-state move in Texas subsequent to a federal conviction for a sex offense. Fifth Circuit reversed the conviction on the grounds that it was unconstitutional as applied to defendant in that he was no longer in a special relationship with the federal government at the time of the failure to register offense.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Holding:\u00a0<\/strong> United States Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit and affirmed conviction on the grounds that SORNA requirements were authorized under constitution&#8217;s Military Regulation Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause, and that defendant was required to register under pre-SORNA Wetterling Act.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>Case Documents<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"default\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Supreme-Court-Opinion.pdf\">Supreme Court Opinion<\/a>\u00a0| view via <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=7911033083464678018&amp;q=133+S.+Ct.+2496&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4000006&amp;scioq=133+S.+Ct.+2496\">Google Scholar<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Respondents-Brief.pdf\">Respondent&#8217;s Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Brief-for-United-States.pdf\">Brief for United States<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/61\/2017\/07\/Cato-Amicus-Brief.pdf\">Cato Amicus Brief<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\"><em>News and Related Materials<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"default\">\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/united-states-v-kebodeaux\/\">[SCOTUSblog] &#8211; United States v. Kebodeaux<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States Supreme Court holding that SORN&#8217;s registration requirements authorized by Military Regulation Clause as well as Necessary and Proper Clause of federal Constitution. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2017\/07\/26\/u-s-v-kedobeaux-2012\/\" class=\"more-link\">U.S. v. Kebodeaux (US 2013)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":242,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[116,221],"class_list":{"0":"post-218","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-sorn-cases","7":"tag-awa","8":"tag-united-states-supreme-court","9":"entry"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/242"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}