{"id":2677,"date":"2021-11-02T18:32:46","date_gmt":"2021-11-02T23:32:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/?p=2677"},"modified":"2021-11-02T18:32:46","modified_gmt":"2021-11-02T23:32:46","slug":"united-states-v-borum-n-d-miss-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mitchellhamline.edu\/sex-offense-litigation-policy\/2021\/11\/02\/united-states-v-borum-n-d-miss-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"United States v. Borum (N.D. Miss. 2021)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

United States v. Borum, No. 3:20CV6 (N.D. Miss. 2021)<\/h2>\n

Nature of Case: <\/strong><\/strong> The government sought advance ruling as to whether defendant’s prior conviction for Criminal Sexual Conduct in Michigan would be admissible in the present prosecution for Failure to Register as a Sex Offender based on the fact that the conviction was obtained following a nolo contendere<\/em> plea.\u00a0 The parties did not dispute that, after his Michigan conviction, defendant was required to register following the passage of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).<\/p>\n

Holding: <\/strong> The District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi granted the government’s motion in limine for advance ruling on admissibility, concluding that defendant’s nolo contendere<\/em> plea is admissible and stating that defendant accepted the “penal consequence” of the registry requirement and complied with it for nearly 10 years before relocating to Mississippi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Case Documents<\/em><\/h2>\n