WASHINGTON \u2013 Eight months after the U.S. Supreme Court effectively upheld a decision saying parts of Michigan’s sex offender registry law \u2014 one of the toughest in the nation \u2014 were unconstitutional, thousands of former sex offenders who thought they’d be off the registry by now, or facing less severe restrictions, have seen no changes.<\/p>\n
The law remains in place, unchanged, with the state defending it in more than three dozen lawsuits \u2014 many of which it has already lost. The controversy involves a ruling two years ago by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati that said provisions enacted in 2006 and 2011 and applied to offenders convicted before then violates constitutional protections against increasing punishments after-the-fact. Last October, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the state’s challenge to that ruling, effectively upholding it.<\/p>\n
The rules prohibit offenders \u2014 many of whom have gone years if not decades without committing any crimes \u2014 from legally living, working or even standing within 1,000 feet of a school, a regulation that many say makes it hard for them to work, or to pick up or see their kids at school, and has forced some to give up jobs and homes. The rules also require offenders to immediately register email addresses or vehicles and report to police as often as four times a year, in some cases, for the rest of their lives.<\/p>\n