• Skip to main content

Laboratory for Advancing Dispute Resolution Skills

From the Dispute Resolution Institute at Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Gee Wind v. SpinPower

  • Home
  • RESOURCES
  • DRI PRESS
  • COLLECTIONS
    • Marjorie Corman Aaron
    • Jim Coben
    • Ken Fox
    • Jim Hilbert
  • NEXTGEN

Resources > Gee Wind v. SpinPower

Duration: 20 – 30 minutes run time

NextGen: Yes 

Teaching Notes: Yes

Skills: ADR | Negotiation 

Skill Levels: Basic | Intermediate 

Type of Resources: Simulation 

Subjects: Contracts | Doctrinal Subjects | Torts 

Modality: Both Online and In-Person

Participants: Groups of 2

Gee Wind v. SpinPower 

Marjorie Corman Aaron 

 

This fairly simple two-party simulation is intended to teach effective distributive negotiation strategies and behaviors. Simulation run time is 20- 30 minutes plus debrief. While the fact pattern describes potential litigation and legal claims, entanglement in any hypothetical litigation is not the most important element in establishing a reasonable settlement. GEE-Wind’s attorney drafted a complaint against SpinPower for $200 million, claiming slander, tortious interference with contractual relations, tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship, and stealing trade secrets.

Gee Wind v. SpinPower: Teaching Note (pdf)

Gee Wind v. SpinPower: Counsel for GEE-Wind Co. (pdf)

Gee Wind v. SpinPower: Counsel for SpinPower, Inc. (pdf)

 

Laboratory for Advancing Dispute Resolution Skills Teaching

Dispute Resolution Insitute at Mitchell Hamline School of law

875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105-3076 | [email protected]

© 2026 Mitchell Hamline School of Law in affiliation with Hamline University.