![](https://mitchellhamline.edu/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2022/12/Jason-Marisam-214x300.jpg)
Associate Professor Jason Marisam
The authors of three briefs in an important election-related Supreme Court case have cited a forthcoming law review article by Mitchell Hamline Associate Professor Jason Marisam.
Oral arguments in the case, Moore v. Harper, will be heard this week, on December 7. Marisam’s forthcoming article focuses on the crux of the case – a theory called the independent state legislature theory. The case is over redistricting maps in North Carolina. Legal experts contend if the conservative-leaning Supreme Court backs the theory, it will have important ramifications on elections throughout the country. Marisam’s article, entitled “The Dangerous Independent State Legislature Theory,” explains and exposes its “flaws and dangers.” It will be published by the Michigan State Law Review.
Mariam’s piece is cited in three briefs filed in the case. One was filed by a bipartisan group of former public officials, former judges, and election experts from Pennsylvania; another was filed by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights under Law, along with fourteen additional organizations; and the third was filed by former Republican elected and executive branch officials. In all three cases, the briefs support the respondents, meaning they oppose the idea of the independent state legislature theory.
“I’m heartened these organizations have looked to this article for inspiration in their work on this case,” said Marisam. “This case is incredibly important to elections and voting, and I hope the justices take the time to fully understand the implications of the independent state legislature theory.”
In short, the independent state legislature theory contends that the U.S. Constitution delegates authority to regulate federal elections in a state to only the state’s elected lawmakers in the legislative branch, and that no checks and balances exist from state judges. The ramifications are far-reaching beyond federal elections, as states usually regulate elections at all levels of government in the same or similar ways.
If a legislature were to change a law over how to regulate elections, the theory implies that a judge could not strike it down for violating the state constitution – as can currently happen. For example, if the Supreme Court were to adopt the strongest version of the theory, judges could not strike down gerrymandered congressional districts drawn by state legislatures.
“The independent state legislature theory would effectively eliminate state-level constitutional protections for voting rights,” Marisam writes, in the article. “However, the justifications for the theory are undertheorized, flawed, and unsupported.
“The theory cannot do the work that should be required before gutting a civil right as important and fundamental as voting.”
Marisam joined the Mitchell Hamline faculty earlier this year from the Minnesota Attorney General’s office, where he was an assistant attorney general in the solicitor general’s division. In 2020, he represented Minnesota’s secretary of state in several court cases over how the election was administered during the pandemic.
“Professor Marisam is doing important work in the area of election law and scholarship around elections,” said Mitchell Hamline President and Dean Anthony Niedwiecki. “Our students are already benefiting from his expertise.”
While the Supreme Court justices will hear the case on December 7, they have until the end of their term next summer to issue their final opinion.
Mitchell Hamline faculty
The latest from Faculty in the News
Voice of San Diego April 9, 2024
News from the States April 1, 2024
Law360 April 17, 2024
The latest faculty publications
NYSBA Weekly June 4, 2024
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (57) June 15, 2024
Bulletin+ (July/August 2024) July 1, 2024
The latest faculty headlines
Prof. Denise Roy retires from Mitchell Hamline after three decades
Professor Denise Roy It can be bittersweet to leave a place before you’re ready, something Professor Denise Roy has now done twice in her career. The first time was in 1991, as Roy made the decision to add the title “professor” to her repertoire. Now, …
Prof. James Coben steps away from full-time teaching
“If you would have told me 35 years ago that I’d still be here, I’m not sure I’d have believed you,” said Professor Emeritus James Coben, reflecting on his time at Mitchell Hamline. He is giving up his full-time teaching load, but he will continue to t …
Professor Tahdooahnippah elected chairman of the Comanche Nation
Chairman Forrest Tahdooahnippah As the weight of the ceremonial blanket settled in on Forrest Tahdooahnippah’s shoulder at his recent swearing-in ceremony, so too did the weight of responsibility. “This is a huge opportunity and a very humbling experie …