This Article uses internal memoranda and emails to describe the efforts of the California Department of Mental Health to suppress a serious and well-designed study that showed just 6.5% of untreated sexually violent predators were arrested for a new sex crime within 4.8 years of release from a locked mental facility. The Article begins by historically situating sexually violent predator laws and then explains the constitutionally critical role that prospective sexual dangerousness plays in justifying these laws. The Article next explains how the U.S. Supreme Court and the highest state courts have allowed these laws to exist without requir- ing any proof of actual danger. It then describes the California study and recon- ciles its findings with those of a well-known Washington study by explaining the preventive effects of increasing age. Finally, the Article explains how these results undermine the justification for indeterminate lifetime commitment of sex offenders.
1st Amendment 1st Cir. 2nd Cir. 3rd Cir. 4th Amendment 4th Cir. 5th Amendment 5th Cir. 6th Amendment 6th Cir. 7th Cir. 8th Amendment 8th Cir. 9th Cir. 9th Circuit 10th Amendment 10th Cir. 11th Cir. 14th Amendment Actual Innocence Administrative exhaustion Administrative Procedures Act AEDPA Alabama Alaska Antisocial Personality Disorder Apprendi / Alleyne Arizona As-Applied Assistance of Counsel AWA Bail Bill of Attainder Burden of Proof California Churches Civil Commitment Collateral Estoppel Colorado Compelled Speech Conditions of Confinement Conditions of Release Connecticut D.C. Cir. Daubert Deregistration Double Jeopardy Due Process Equal Protection Evidentiary Standards Ex Post Facto Expungement Extraterritorial Registration Failure to Register Familial Relationships Florida Foreign Commerce Clause Fourteenth Amendment Freedom of Association Full Faith and Credit Georgia GPS Habeas Corpus Halloween Hearsay Heck bar Homelessness Housing HUD Idaho Illinois Immigration Indiana Ineffective Assistance International Travel Internet Identifiers Internet Restrictions Iowa Jury Instructions Juvenile Registration Kansas Kentucky Law Review Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Mental disorder Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Neb. Nebraska Necessary and Proper New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Non-Sexual Offense Nondelegation North Carolina North Dakota Notification Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Out-of-state Offense Overbreadth Paraphilia Diagnosis Pardon Parole Pennsylvania Personality Disorder Plea Agreement Plethysmograph PLRA Polygraphs Preemption Presence Restrictions Privileges and Immunities Procedural Default Procedural Due Process PROTECT Act Punishment Qualified Immunity Recidivism Reclassification Residential Banishment Res Judicata Retroactive Application (Non-EPF) Revocation of Supervision Right to Jury Trial Right to Parent Right to Travel Ripeness Risk School Property Second / Subsequent Offense Secondary Materials Sentencing Sexual Predator designation Sign Posting South Carolina South Dakota Special Needs Speedy Trial Standing Substantive Due Process Supervised Release SVP Takings Clause Tennessee Texas Tiering / Classification Tolling Transitional Release Travel Travel Restrictions Treatment Programs Treaty power United States Supreme Court Utah Vagueness Vermont Virginia Void-for-Vagueness Voting Rights Vt. Washington Wisconsin