Juvenile Registration

Doe v. Peterson (D. Neb. 2021)

Posted: March 24, 2021

Federal district court opinion finding no constitutional violation with regard to Nebraska requiring juveniles adjudicated out of state and registered privately in their respective states to be placed on Nebraska's public registry upon moving there.

Doe v. Peterson (D. Neb. 2021)

People v. Suarez (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Posted: February 11, 2021

New York Appellate Division opinion holding that New York state legislature did not intend school grounds exclusion provisions of state sex offense law to apply to youthful offenders.

People v. Suarez (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

B.K. v. Grewal (D.N.J. 2020)

Posted: September 23, 2020

New Jersey district court opinion dismissing a constitutional challenge to New Jersey's sex offense registration scheme in the context of plaintiffs who had been adjudicated as juveniles.

B.K. v. Grewal (D.N.J. 2020)

Commonwealth v. Haines (Pa. Super. 2019)

Posted: November 1, 2019

Pennsylvania Superior Court opinion holding that requiring sex offense registration for individual who committed sexual offenses as a juvenile, but was not convicted until reaching adulthood, was unconstitutional.

Commonwealth v. Haines (Pa. Super. 2019)

State ex rel A.N. (La. 2019)

Posted: October 23, 2019

Louisiana Supreme Court opinion declining, on procedural grounds, to address argument that juvenile sex offense registration violates 8th Amendment.

State ex rel A.N. (La. 2019)

State v. N.R. (Kan. Ct. App. 2019)

Posted: September 27, 2019

Kansas Court of Appeals opinion holding that KORA does not violate prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment or retroactive punishment in the context of a person required to register who committed their offense as a juvenile.

State v. N.R. (Kan. Ct. App. 2019)

In re T.B. (Colo. App. 2019)

Posted: June 29, 2019

Colorado Court of Appeals holding that requiring lifetime registration for juveniles adjudicated of sex offenses constitutes punishment for Eighth Amendment purposes, and remanded the case for consideration of whether the Eighth Amendment is violated when the state mandates lifetime sex offense registration for juveniles.

In re T.B. (Colo. App. 2019)

In re Z.B. (S.D. 2008)

Posted: January 20, 2019

South Dakota Supreme Court holding that the registration requirement for certain juvenile sex offenders, which did not provide the same opportunity provided to adults who commit same offense to have names removed from registry if they obtained suspended imposition of sentence, violated equal protection.

In re Z.B. (S.D. 2008)

In re CK (N.J. 2018)

Posted: January 20, 2019

New Jersey Supreme Court opinion holding that subjecting juveniles to more onerous registration requirements than those imposed on adults violates substantive due procress..

In re CK (N.J. 2018)

In the Interest of T.H., (Iowa 2018)

Posted: June 26, 2018

Iowa Supreme Court holding that juvenile sex offender registration requirement, while it does constitute punishment, it is not cruel and unusual.

In the Interest of T.H., (Iowa 2018)

1 2 Next »

Doe v. Peterson (D. Neb. 2021)

People v. Suarez (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

B.K. v. Grewal (D.N.J. 2020)

Commonwealth v. Haines (Pa. Super. 2019)

State ex rel A.N. (La. 2019)

State v. N.R. (Kan. Ct. App. 2019)

In re T.B. (Colo. App. 2019)

In re Z.B. (S.D. 2008)

In re CK (N.J. 2018)

In the Interest of T.H., (Iowa 2018)

Topics

Jurisdiction

Constitutional Issues

Substantive Issues

The Mitchell Hamline J.D.

J.D. enrollment options

Specialized Degree Programs

Journals and Law Reviews

Study Abroad

Centers & Institutes

Professional Legal Education

Special Programs

General Information

Action Items