Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Menu Search
  • Home
  • About
    about

    About

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law, located in St. Paul, Minnesota offers a rigorous, practice-based experience, preparing graduates to serve clients and communities. Our motivated students study full time or part time, on-campus or partially online in the way that fits their lives.

    • Accreditation
    • Awards, Rankings, and Recognition
    • Blended Learning at Mitchell Hamline
    • Board of Trustees
    • Civic Engagement
    • History
    • Employment at Mitchell Hamline
    • Life at Mitchell Hamline
    • Notable Alumni
    • Partnerships
    • Pre-Law Programs
    • President and Dean
    • Rosalie Wahl Legal Practice Center
    • Affiliation with Hamline University
  • Academics
    academics

    Academics

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law

    Academics

    Academics
    • A degree that prepares you for practice
    • J.D. Enrollment Options
    • Centers and Institutes
    • LL.M. and Other Degree Programs
    • Journals and Law Reviews
    • Study Abroad
    • Non-Degree Certificates
  • Prospective J.D. Students
    prospective-j-d-students

    Prospective J.D. Students

    Learn about the application process and connect with our Admissions team.

    • Admissions Materials
    • Admissions Team
    • Applying
    • Frequent Questions
    • Student Profile
    • Tuition and Financing
    • Visiting Mitchell Hamline
    • Yellow Ribbon Law School
    • ABA Required Disclosures
    • Employment Summary Reports
  • Faculty
    faculty

    Faculty

    Faculty
    • Faculty and Academic Deans
    • Senior Leadership
    • Faculty Emeritus
    • Adjunct Faculty
    • Board of Trustees
    • Faculty Experts Guide
    • Mitchell Hamline Open Access
  • Alumni
    alumni

    Alumni

    Alumni
    • Alumni Association Board
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Mentoring
    • Alumni Award Recipients
    • Elected and Appointed Officials in Minnesota
    • Notable Alumni
  • Library
    library

    Library

    Library
    • Catalog
    • Circulation
    • Computing
    • Document Delivery
    • Interlibrary Loan
    • Library Staff
    • Policies
    • Printing / Scanning / Copying
  • Giving
    giving

    Giving

    Giving
    • Impact of Giving
    • Recognition and Thanks
    • Mitchell Hamline Priorities
    • Planned Giving
    • The Annual Fund
    • Staff
  • Admitted Students
    admitted-students
    • Admitted Students 101
    • Important dates
    • Tuition and Financial Aid
    • Merit Scholarships
    • Student Resources
    • Law School Preparation
  • Current Students
    current-students
    • Academic Excellence Program
    • Bookstore
    • Career and Professional Development
    • Competitions and Moot Courts
    • Counseling Services
    • Dean of Students
    • Disability Services
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Financial Aid
    • Information Technology Services
    • Registrar
    • Student Finances and Payroll
    • Warren E. Burger Law Library
  • Career Development
    career-development
    • Resources for Students
    • Solo and Small Firm Practice
    • Resources for Employers
    • Resources for Alumni
    • Reciprocity
    • Staff
    • Employment and Salary Reports
    • Non-Discrimination Policy
  • Faculty & Staff Web
    faculty-staff-web
    • The Summit
    • Technology Services For Faculty and Staff
  • News
    news
    • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
    • Media Experts Guide
    • Subscribe
  • Tech
    tech
    • Course Design and Teaching
    • Record, Broadcast, and Go Live
    • Network and Other Technical Support
    • Jenzabar One System Upgrade
    • Monthly ITS Newsletter
    • Tech Knowledge Base
  • Email Access
  • Canvas
  • Office 365
  • Zoom
  • Password Reset
  • Starfish
  • VPN
  • Student Records
  •  
  • This website

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

SORN Cases

Litigation and Policy Resource Center

  • Home
  • Center Activities
  • Center Newsletter
  • News and Notes
  • Civil Commitment
    • Civil Commitment Cases
    • Civil Commitment Secondary Materials
    • Civil Commitment News
  • Residency
    • Residency Cases
    • Residency Secondary Materials
    • Residency News
  • Sex Offender Registration & Notification (SORN)
    • SORN Cases
    • SORN Secondary Materials
    • SORN News

Search SOLPRC

Recent Cases

  • McDeid v. Johnston (Minn. 2023)

  • In re T.O. (Cal. Ct. App. 2022)

  • People v. Kastman (Ill. 2022)

  • State v. McMahon (La. Ct. App. 2022)

  • Commonwealth v. Roderick (Mass. 2022)

  • Lake Naomi Club, Inc. v. Rosado (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022)

  • State v. Larson (Minn. 2022)

  • Doe as Next Friend of Doe #6 v. Swearingen (11th Cir. 2022)

  • McGuire v. Marshall (11th Cir. 2022)

  • Baughman v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. 2022)

Contact Information

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105

Professor Eric Janus, Director

eric.janus @mitchellhamline.edu

Madeline Ranum, Policy Fellow

651-695-7638

madeline.ranum @mitchellhamline.edu


Doe v. Department of Justice (C.D. Cal. 2023)

California District Court order granting a preliminary injunction, enjoining the federal government from prosecuting California residents under 18 U.S.C. § 2250 for a violation of SORNA without first obtaining certification from the State of California that the individual was required to register under California state law, and, in a prosecution for a failure to provide specific required information, that California law allows the individual to furnish that information to state authorities.

In re T.O. (Cal. Ct. App. 2022)

California Court of Appeals opinion affirming lower court and holding that under California law Juvenile Court lacked authority to impose sex offense registration requirements upon juvenile who was not committed to Division of Juvenile Justice.

State v. McMahon (La. Ct. App. 2022)

Louisiana Court of Appeals opinion concluding that Louisiana statute, La. R.S. 14:91.5, which prohibits the use of social networking sites by select categories of required registrants, is narrowly tailored and does not violate First Amendment rights.

Commonwealth v. Roderick (Mass. 2022)

Opinion by the Massachusetts Supreme Court concluding that the imposition of global positioning system (GPS) monitoring as a condition of the defendant’s probation following a conviction of rape constituted an unreasonable search in violation of art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.

State v. Larson (Minn. 2022)

Minnesota Supreme Court opinion holding that, under Minnesota law, separate convictions for failure to register involving the same assignment of a corrections agent violated prohibitions against double jeopardy.

Doe as Next Friend of Doe #6 v. Swearingen (11th Cir. 2022)

Eleventh Circuit opinion holding that the continuing violation doctrine applies to required registrants’ claims based on reputational injury and regular reporting requirements in challenge to constitutionality of sex offense registration law.

McGuire v. Marshall (11th Cir. 2022)

Eleventh Circuit per curiam opinion rejecting plaintiff-appellant’s Ex Post Facto challenge and concluding that the provisions of Alabama’s sex offense registration law at issue, including residency and employment restrictions, homeless-reporting requirements, travel notification requirements, and direct community notification requirements, were not punitive in effect. 

Cao v. Pennsylvania State Police (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022)

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court opinion concluding that based on recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court precedent SORNA II is nonpunitive in effect and retroactive application of the statute did not violate Petitioner’s rights under state and federal ex post facto clauses.

People v. Krull (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

New York Appellate Division holding as a matter of first impression that, because of the life-long implications of SORA risk level, when a defendant has invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination the SORA court should not assess any points for a failure to accept responsibility when defendant’s trial testimony denied the allegations and he has a pending direct appeal.

Wright v. Alaska (9th Cir. 2022)

Ninth Circuit opinion, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, concluding that Appellant was not “in custody” under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as result of his Alaska state conviction, despite SORNA registration requirements in Tennessee based on his Alaska conviction.

United States v. Thayer (7th Cir. 2022)

Seventh Circuit opinion holding, as a matter of first impression, that courts should employ circumstance-specific approach when determining whether conduct was a sex offense against a minor, as would render a conviction a sex offense under SORNA.

Braam v. Carr (7th Cir. 2022)

Seventh Circuit opinion affirming district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction and concluding that plaintiffs were not likely to succeed on the merits of their Fourth Amendment claim because, under the totality of the circumstances, lifetime GPS monitoring of purported class of individuals convicted of repeat sex offenses against children is not an unreasonable search.

People v. Nunez (Mich. Ct. App. 2022)

Michigan Court of Appeals opinion reversing lower court decision and concluding that because SORA is a punitive collateral consequence for the conviction of certain crimes, a defendant must be informed of its imposition before entering a guilty plea and the registration requirement must be included in the judgment of sentence.

People v. Lymon (Mich. Ct. App. 2022)

Michigan Court of Appeals opinion in Eighth Amendment case concluding that Michigan’s SORA statute, as amended in 2021, is punitive in effect and that its punishment was cruel and unusual as applied to defendant where the offense underlying the registration requirement lacked a sexual component.

Interest of C.G. (Wis. 2022)

Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects transgender woman’s challenge to Wisconsin registry based on registry provision preventing registrants from legally changing their names, concluding that (1) under well established precedent, placement on the registry is not a “punishment” under the Eighth Amendment and, even if it was, registration is neither cruel not unusual, and (2) petitioner’s right to free speech does not encompass the power to compel the State to facilitate a change of her legal name.

State v. Anthony (N.C. Ct. App. 2022)

North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion concluding that lifetime Satellite Based Monitoring (“SBM”) of Defendant was not an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment after balancing the state’s interest in “preventing and prosecuting future crimes”, Defendant’s “diminished expectation of privacy both during and after any period of post-release supervision,” and the “limited intrusion” caused by lifetime SBM.

Commonwealth v. Corbett (Mass. App. Ct. 2022)

Massachusetts Court of Appeals opinion in failure to register case concluding that trial court judge abused his discretion in excluding expert testimony proposed by the defendant regarding mental disorders which impacted his ability to remember his registration obligation.

A.L. v. Pennsylvania State Police (Pa. 2022)

Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion applying a categorical approach analysis and concluding that sexual assault under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and sexual assault under the Pennsylvania Criminal Code are not comparable offenses supporting the classification of Appellee as a tier III registrant under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act.

Smith v. St. Louis County Police, et al. (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals decision determining, contrary to prior Missouri appellate court decisions, that a “tier I” sex offender under both MO-SORA and SORNA, who is otherwise eligible for removal from the Registry after satisfying the requirements of relevant MO-SORA provisions, should not be required to remain on the Registry for the remainder of their life due to the purported “interplay” between the requirements of MO-SORA and SORNA.

State v. Snider (Wash. 2022)

In a split decision, the Washington Supreme Court, sitting en banc, concludes that a pro se Petitioner’s guilty to plea to a Failure to Register charge was constitutionally valid even though the trial court did not explicitly inform Petitioner that the knowledge element of failure to register necessarily includes knowledge of the specific circumstance giving rise to the responsibility to register under the statute.

Brown v. Maher (N.D.N.Y. 2022)

District Court granting Plaintiff a preliminary injunction where Plaintiff’s right to live with his wife and step-children was prohibited by parole conditions preventing him from contacting any person under the age of eighteen, concluding that Plaintiff’s right to live with his wife was fundamental, that he was likely to succeed on the merits of his § 1983 due process claim, that he faced a likelihood of irreparable harm, and that the balance of equities and public interest favored issuance of a preliminary injunction.  

Doe v. Frisz (Mo. 2022)

Missouri Supreme Court opinion holding that allegations in abandoned charges could not be considered in determining sex offense registration status and that a sheriff lacked authority to determine whether Appellant was required to register, but concluding that a writ of prohibition was not appropriate to control the sheriff because his determination was not a judicial or quasi-judicial act.

Cornelio v. Connecticut (2d Cir. 2022)

The Second Circuit opinion reversing dismissal of a First Amendment claim challenging requirement that those registered under Connecticut’s sex offense registration law notify the state each time they create a new email address, instant messenger address, or other internet communication identifier, concluding that because Connecticut’s requirement risks chilling online speech, it is subject to heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment.

United States v. Wells (9th Cir. 2022)

Ninth Circuit opinion concluding that a waiver of the right to appeal a sentence does not apply to certain constitutional claims and concluding that a special condition of supervised release restricting the possession of a computer, including any electronic device capable of accessing the internet or processing or storing data as described at 18 U.S.C. Section 1030(e)(1), is unconstitutionally vague.

Lindsey v. Swearingen (N.D. Fla. 2022)

District Court holding rejecting Full Faith and Credit Clause and Equal Protection arguments and holding, first, that Florida may require a new resident to register as a “sex offender” based on a crime committed in a state where the individual lived previously, even though a court in that state terminated that state’s registration requirement and, second, that Florida is not required to purge or deny public access to prior registration records where an individual has left the state.

Atryzek v. State of Rhode Island (R.I. 2022)

Rhode Island Supreme Court opinion in postconviction registry challenge affirming Superior Court’s judgment in part and quashed the judgment in part, concluding that Defendant is no longer required to register, that dates of alleged offenses, not dates of conviction, controlled whether a registration duty was violated, and that the state’s argument that earlier convictions gave rise to new independent duty to register was outside the scope of remand.

Gardei v. Conway (Ga. 2022)

Supreme Court of Georgia opinion holding that two-year statute of limitations did not bar Appellant’s registry challenge seeking prospective declaratory relief due to the recurring annual nature of the registration requirement imposed on Appellant.

United States v. Englehart (10th Cir. 2022)

Tenth Circuit opinion vacating a lower court order imposing conditions of supervision including a revised Sexual Material Prohibition and a Mental Health Condition, concluding that the lower court (1) failed to make particularized findings of compelling circumstances and balance competing First Amendment concerns with respect to the revised Sexual Material Prohibition, and (2) failed to give even a generalized statement of reasons to justify the Mental Health Condition.

State of Arkansas v. Scott (Ark. 2022)

Supreme Court of Arkansas opinion concluding that SORA’s plain language requires Defendant-Appellee to register in spite of his acquittal for all relevant charges, because first-degree false imprisonment and kidnapping are defined as “sex offenses” under SORA, and SORA’s express language requires a person to register if he or she has been acquitted of a “sex offense” on the grounds of mental disease or defect.

Doe v. Settle (4th Cir. 2022)

Fourth Circuit opinion rejecting Plaintiff-Appellant’s Equal Protection and Eighth Amendment claims where a plea to a lesser offense resulted in worse treatment under the registry, holding that differential treatment between the charges of “carnal knowledge” and “indecent liberties” passed rationale basis scrutiny and that Virginia’s registry scheme does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment” because it is not punitive.

1 2 3 … 11 Next »

Topics

Jurisdiction

10th Cir. 11th Cir. 1st Cir. 2nd Cir. 3rd Cir. 4th Cir. 5th Cir. 6th Cir. 7th Cir. 8th Cir. 9th Cir. 9th Circuit Alabama Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut D.C. Cir. Florida Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Neb. Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas United States Supreme Court Utah Vermont Virginia Vt. Washington Wisconsin

Constitutional Issues

10th Amendment 14th Amendment 1st Amendment 4th Amendment 5th Amendment 6th Amendment 8th Amendment Assistance of Counsel Bail Bill of Attainder Compelled Speech Double Jeopardy Due Process Equal Protection Ex Post Facto Foreign Commerce Clause Fourteenth Amendment Freedom of Association Full Faith and Credit Habeas Corpus Necessary and Proper Nondelegation Overbreadth Privileges and Immunities Procedural Due Process Right to Jury Trial Right to Parent Right to Travel Ripeness Speedy Trial Standing Substantive Due Process Takings Clause Treaty power Void-for-Vagueness

Substantive Issues

Actual Innocence Administrative exhaustion Administrative Procedures Act AEDPA Antisocial Personality Disorder Apprendi / Alleyne As-Applied AWA Burden of Proof Churches Civil Commitment Collateral Estoppel Conditions of Confinement Conditions of Release Daubert Deregistration Evidentiary Standards Expungement Extraterritorial Registration Failure to Register Familial Relationships GPS Halloween Hearsay Heck bar Homelessness Housing HUD Immigration Ineffective Assistance International Travel Internet Identifiers Internet Restrictions Jury Instructions Juvenile Registration Mental disorder Non-Sexual Offense Notification Out-of-state Offense Paraphilia Diagnosis Pardon Parole Personality Disorder Plea Agreement Plethysmograph PLRA Polygraphs Preemption Presence Restrictions Procedural Default PROTECT Act Punishment Qualified Immunity Recidivism Reclassification Res Judicata Residential Banishment Retroactive Application (Non-EPF) Revocation of Supervision Risk School Property Second / Subsequent Offense Sentencing Sexual Predator designation Sign Posting Special Needs Supervised Release SVP Tiering / Classification Tolling Transitional Release Travel Travel Restrictions Treatment Programs Voting Rights





  • About
  • Academics
  • Prospective Students
  • Faculty
  • Alumni
  • Library
  • Giving
  • Admitted Students
  • Current Students
  • Career Development
  • Faculty and Staff

The Mitchell Hamline J.D.

  • In the Classroom
  • In Simulated Practice
  • In the Real World

J.D. enrollment options

  • Full time
  • Part time, day or evening
  • Blended learning

Specialized Degree Programs

Journals and Law Reviews

Study Abroad

Centers & Institutes

  • Center for Law and Business
  • Center for the Study of Black Life and the Law
  • Dispute Resolution Institute
  • Health Law Institute
  • Institute to Transform Child Protection
  • Intellectual Property Institute
    • Patent Law Program
  • Native American Law and Sovereignty Institute
  • Public Health Law Center

Certificate Programs

Special Programs

  • Expert Witness Training Academy
  • Minnesota Justice Foundation
  • Mitchell Hamline Fellows Program
  • Office of Academic Excellence
  • Pre-Law Programs
  • Self-Help Clinic
  • Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center
  • Truth and Action
  • Upper Midwest Patent Assistance
  • World Without Genocide

General Information

  • Consumer Information
    (ABA Required Disclosures)
  • Campus Security Report
  • Student Complaint Process
  • Academic Calendars
  • COVID-19 Information
  • Civic Engagement
  • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
  • Department/Office Contacts
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • Directions, Maps, and Parking
  • Directories
  • Privacy Statement

Action Items

  • Ask a Question
  • Make a Gift
  • Subscribe to Email News
  • Jobs at Mitchell Hamline
  • Apply for Admission
  • Hire a Student or Graduate
  • Shop the Bookstore
  • Sexual Misconduct Policy
  • Sexual Misconduct Policy
  • ABA Required Disclosures

875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105-3076 1-888-962-5529 651-227-9171

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

© 2023 Mitchell Hamline School of Law in affiliation with Hamline University.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Linked In
  • Instagram