Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Menu Search
  • Home
  • About
    about

    About

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law, located in St. Paul, Minnesota offers a rigorous, practice-based experience, preparing graduates to serve clients and communities. Our motivated students study full time or part time, on-campus or partially online in the way that fits their lives.

    • Accreditation
    • Awards, Rankings, and Recognition
    • Blended Learning at Mitchell Hamline
    • Board of Trustees
    • Civic Engagement
    • History
    • Employment at Mitchell Hamline
    • Life at Mitchell Hamline
    • Notable Alumni
    • Partnerships
    • Pre-Law Programs
    • President and Dean
    • Rosalie Wahl Legal Practice Center
    • Affiliation with Hamline University
  • Academics
    academics

    Academics

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law

    Academics

    Academics
    • A degree that prepares you for practice
    • J.D. Enrollment Options
    • Centers and Institutes
    • LL.M. and Other Degree Programs
    • Journals and Law Reviews
    • Study Abroad
    • Non-Degree Certificates
  • Prospective J.D. Students
    prospective-j-d-students

    Prospective J.D. Students

    Learn about the application process and connect with our Admissions team.

    • Admissions Materials
    • Admissions Team
    • Applying
    • Frequent Questions
    • Student Profile
    • Tuition and Financing
    • Visiting Mitchell Hamline
    • Yellow Ribbon Law School
    • ABA Required Disclosures
    • Employment Summary Reports
  • Faculty
    faculty

    Faculty

    Faculty
    • Faculty and Academic Deans
    • Senior Leadership
    • Faculty Emeritus
    • Adjunct Faculty
    • Board of Trustees
    • Faculty Experts Guide
    • Mitchell Hamline Open Access
  • Alumni
    alumni

    Alumni

    Alumni
    • Alumni Association Board
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Mentoring
    • Alumni Award Recipients
    • Elected and Appointed Officials in Minnesota
    • Notable Alumni
  • Library
    library

    Library

    Library
    • Catalog
    • Circulation
    • Computing
    • Document Delivery
    • Interlibrary Loan
    • Library Staff
    • Policies
    • Printing / Scanning / Copying
  • Giving
    giving

    Giving

    Giving
    • Impact of Giving
    • Recognition and Thanks
    • Mitchell Hamline Priorities
    • Planned Giving
    • The Annual Fund
    • Staff
  • Admitted Students
    admitted-students
    • Admitted Students 101
    • Important dates
    • Tuition and Financial Aid
    • Merit Scholarships
    • Student Resources
    • Law School Preparation
  • Current Students
    current-students
    • Academic Excellence Program
    • Bookstore
    • Career and Professional Development
    • Competitions and Moot Courts
    • Counseling Services
    • Dean of Students
    • Disability Services
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Financial Aid
    • Information Technology Services
    • Registrar
    • Student Finances and Payroll
    • Warren E. Burger Law Library
  • Career Development
    career-development
    • Resources for Students
    • Solo and Small Firm Practice
    • Resources for Employers
    • Resources for Alumni
    • Reciprocity
    • Staff
    • Employment and Salary Reports
    • Non-Discrimination Policy
  • Faculty & Staff Web
    faculty-staff-web
    • The Summit
    • Technology Services For Faculty and Staff
  • News
    news
    • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
    • Media Experts Guide
    • Subscribe
  • Tech
    tech
    • Course Design and Teaching
    • Record, Broadcast, and Go Live
    • Network and Other Technical Support
    • Jenzabar One System Upgrade
    • Monthly ITS Newsletter
    • Tech Knowledge Base
  • Email Access
  • Canvas
  • Office 365
  • Zoom
  • Password Reset
  • Starfish
  • VPN
  • Student Records
  •  
  • This website

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

Residency Cases

Litigation and Policy Resource Center

  • Home
  • Center Activities
  • Center Newsletter
  • News and Notes
  • Civil Commitment
    • Civil Commitment Cases
    • Civil Commitment Secondary Materials
    • Civil Commitment News
  • Residency
    • Residency Cases
    • Residency Secondary Materials
    • Residency News
  • Sex Offender Registration & Notification (SORN)
    • SORN Cases
    • SORN Secondary Materials
    • SORN News

Search SOLPRC

Recent Cases

  • McDeid v. Johnston (Minn. 2023)

  • Doe v. Department of Justice (C.D. Cal. 2023)

  • In re T.O. (Cal. Ct. App. 2022)

  • People v. Kastman (Ill. 2022)

  • State v. McMahon (La. Ct. App. 2022)

  • Commonwealth v. Roderick (Mass. 2022)

  • State v. Larson (Minn. 2022)

  • Doe as Next Friend of Doe #6 v. Swearingen (11th Cir. 2022)

  • McGuire v. Marshall (11th Cir. 2022)

  • Baughman v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. 2022)

Contact Information

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105

Professor Eric Janus, Director

eric.janus @mitchellhamline.edu

Madeline Ranum, Policy Fellow

651-695-7638

madeline.ranum @mitchellhamline.edu


Lake Naomi Club, Inc. v. Rosado (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022)

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court opinion holding as a matter of first impression that private, planned community restrictive covenants prohibiting the residence of individuals required to register under Pennsylvania’s sex offense registry are void as a matter of public policy.

McGuire v. Marshall (11th Cir. 2022)

Eleventh Circuit per curiam opinion rejecting plaintiff-appellant’s Ex Post Facto challenge and concluding that the provisions of Alabama’s sex offense registration law at issue, including residency and employment restrictions, homeless-reporting requirements, travel notification requirements, and direct community notification requirements, were not punitive in effect. 

Koch v. Village of Hartland (7th Cir. 2022)

Seventh Circuit decision in Ex Post Facto case, overturning the retroactivity standard articulated in prior circuit holdings and concluding that the critical inquiry in assessing retroactivity is “whether the law changes the legal consequences of acts completed before its effective date.”  

Alvarez v. Annucci (N.Y. 2022)

New York Court of Appeals opinion holding that residency restrictions of Sexual Assault Reform Act (“SARA”) applied equally to eligible offenders released on parole, conditionally released, or subject to period of post-release supervision.

State v. McCord (Mo. 2021)

Missouri Supreme Court opinion affirming a conviction for residing within 1,000 feet of a school, holding that the distance measurements for Missouri’s housing banishment laws are taken from property line to property line.

Barnes v. Jeffreys (N.D. Ill. 2021)

Illinois district court opinion finding that the Illinois’ Department of Corrections policy of prohibiting more than one registrant from residing at an address while on supervision to be unconstitutional under the 8th and 14th Amendments.

Johnson v. Superintendent (N.Y. 2020)

New York Court of Appeals opinion holding that New York’s practice of imprisoning some individuals convicted of sex offenses past dates they would otherwise be released for want of legal housing was not unconstitutional.

Lingaw v. Lumpkin (Idaho 2020)

Idaho Supreme Court opinion holding that a gymnasium used by a school district counts as a school for purposes of Idaho’s residency restriction statute.

Does v. Miami-Dade County (11th Cir. 2020)

11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the denial of the lower court to allow an as-applied Ex Post Facto claim in a lawsuit over Miami-Dade’s housing banishment laws.

John Doe et al. v. Richard Snyder (E.D. Mich. 2021)

Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granting permanent injunction, prohibiting in total the enforcement of any of Michigan’s sex offense registration scheme to anyone who had committed their offenses prior to 2011, as well as prohibiting the enforcement of numerous provisions to any persons required to register.

Does v. City of San Diego (S.D. Cal. 2019)

Federal District Court for the Southern District of California finding that local San Diego ordinance enacting residential banishment laws for people convicted of sex offenses was preempted by state law.

State v. Schnell (Minn. 2019)

Minnesota Supreme Court opinion finding that Minnesota DOC failed to comply with the law in failing to release an individual, or else otherwise modifying conditions of release.

State v. Lafountain (Or. Ct. App. 2019)

Oregon Court of Appeals ruling that “residence” means something more than a temporary shelter or jail cell, in finding the state’s evidence legally insufficient to convict a defendant of railing to register.

People ex rel Negron v. Superintendent (N.Y. App. Div. 3rd 2019)

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, holding that SARA-related housing restrictions did not apply to individual who was serving a sentence for a non-sexual offense.

Doe v. City of San Diego (S.D. Cal. 2019)

Federal trial court order denying motion to dismiss lawsuit regarding San Diego’s residential banishment laws, alleging various constitutional violations.

Bostic v. D.C. Housing Authority (D.C. Ct. App. 2017).

District of Columbia Court of Appeals opinion holding that the eviction of an individual who was convicted of a 1982 offense and subject to lifetime registration as a sex offender was proper in that it was not contrary to HUD regulations, and was not otherwise preempted.

Gonzalez v. Annucci (N.Y. 2018)

New York Court of Appeals holding that Department of Corrections and Community Supervision complied with statutory duty to assist people convicted of sex offenses in obtaining housing that was compliant with New York’s Sexual Assault Reform Act.

Braylock v. City of Dayton (Hennepin Dist. Ct. 2018).

Hennepin County trial court finding that city’s residential banishment laws were unconstitutional under theories of conflict and field preemption

Mann v. Georgia Dep’t of Corr. (Ga. 2007)

Georgia Supreme Court finding that residential banishment law constituted an unconstitutional taking as applied to Appellant.

In re Taylor (Ca. 2015)

California Supreme Court invalidating blanket imposition of residential banishment laws to those convicted of sex offenses and and parole.

Doe v. City of Lynn (Mass. 2015)

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling that residential banishment law for those convicted of sex offenses that was enacted by city was effectively preempted under Massachusetts Home Rule amendment.

City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Anderson et al., (Broward Co. Ct., Fl. 2018).

Criminal trial court dismissing citations against defendants for violating residential banishment ordinance.

Vasquez v. Foxx (7th Cir. 2018)

7th Circuit Case affirming dismissal of constitutional claims brought against Illinois’ residence restrictions, inter alia, Ex Post Facto, Takings Clause, and both Substantive and Procedural Due Process arguments.

State v. Wade (Mo. 2013)

Missouri Supreme Court held that state constitutional prohibition against retrospective laws applied only to civil, not criminal laws, therefore presence restrictions applied to people on the registry could be constitutionally applied retroactively.

Hoffman v. Village of Pleasant Prairie (E.D. Wis. 2017)

Civil suit brought by registrants in Wisconsin challenging local residency restrictions. District Court found that the restrictions violated prohibition against ex post facto punishments and equal protection.

Doe v. Miami-Dade County (11th Cir. 2017)

11th Circuit reversal of district court dismissal of lawsuit alleging residency restrictions in Miami-Dade county violated prohibitions on retroactive punishment.

Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas (5th Cir. 2017)

5th Circuit case affirming lower court grant of summary judgment to city in re challenge ordinance restricting where those on the registry may reside based on due process and equal protection.

Doe v. City of Lynn (Mass. 2015)

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court opinion declaring unconstitutional local ordinance restricting where people on the registry may live on the grounds of preemption.

Werner v. Wall (7th Cir. 2016)

Seventh Circuit affirmed district court’s grant of summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity to state officials on monetary claims that state law which allowed for continued detention of plaintiff past his maximum release date due to inability to locate housing.

State v. Pollard (Ind. 2009)

Indiana Supreme Court opinion affirming trial court dismissal of charges against person required to register for violating statewide residence restrictions on state constitutional grounds.

1 2 Next »

Topics

Jurisdiction

10th Cir. 11th Cir. 1st Cir. 2nd Cir. 3rd Cir. 4th Cir. 5th Cir. 6th Cir. 7th Cir. 8th Cir. 9th Cir. 9th Circuit Alabama Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut D.C. Cir. Florida Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Neb. Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas United States Supreme Court Utah Vermont Virginia Vt. Washington Wisconsin

Constitutional Issues

10th Amendment 14th Amendment 1st Amendment 4th Amendment 5th Amendment 6th Amendment 8th Amendment Assistance of Counsel Bail Bill of Attainder Compelled Speech Double Jeopardy Due Process Equal Protection Ex Post Facto Foreign Commerce Clause Fourteenth Amendment Freedom of Association Full Faith and Credit Habeas Corpus Necessary and Proper Nondelegation Overbreadth Privileges and Immunities Procedural Due Process Right to Jury Trial Right to Parent Right to Travel Ripeness Speedy Trial Standing Substantive Due Process Takings Clause Treaty power Void-for-Vagueness

Substantive Issues

Actual Innocence Administrative exhaustion Administrative Procedures Act AEDPA Antisocial Personality Disorder Apprendi / Alleyne As-Applied AWA Burden of Proof Churches Civil Commitment Collateral Estoppel Conditions of Confinement Conditions of Release Daubert Deregistration Evidentiary Standards Expungement Extraterritorial Registration Failure to Register Familial Relationships GPS Halloween Hearsay Heck bar Homelessness Housing HUD Immigration Ineffective Assistance International Travel Internet Identifiers Internet Restrictions Jury Instructions Juvenile Registration Mental disorder Non-Sexual Offense Notification Out-of-state Offense Paraphilia Diagnosis Pardon Parole Personality Disorder Plea Agreement Plethysmograph PLRA Polygraphs Preemption Presence Restrictions Procedural Default PROTECT Act Punishment Qualified Immunity Recidivism Reclassification Res Judicata Residential Banishment Retroactive Application (Non-EPF) Revocation of Supervision Risk School Property Second / Subsequent Offense Sentencing Sexual Predator designation Sign Posting Special Needs Supervised Release SVP Tiering / Classification Tolling Transitional Release Travel Travel Restrictions Treatment Programs Voting Rights





  • About
  • Academics
  • Prospective Students
  • Faculty
  • Alumni
  • Library
  • Giving
  • Admitted Students
  • Current Students
  • Career Development
  • Faculty and Staff

The Mitchell Hamline J.D.

  • In the Classroom
  • In Simulated Practice
  • In the Real World

J.D. enrollment options

  • Full time
  • Part time, day or evening
  • Blended learning

Specialized Degree Programs

Journals and Law Reviews

Study Abroad

Centers & Institutes

  • Center for Law and Business
  • Center for the Study of Black Life and the Law
  • Dispute Resolution Institute
  • Health Law Institute
  • Institute to Transform Child Protection
  • Intellectual Property Institute
    • Patent Law Program
  • Native American Law and Sovereignty Institute
  • Public Health Law Center

Certificate Programs

Special Programs

  • Expert Witness Training Academy
  • Minnesota Justice Foundation
  • Mitchell Hamline Fellows Program
  • Office of Academic Excellence
  • Pre-Law Programs
  • Self-Help Clinic
  • Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center
  • Truth and Action
  • Upper Midwest Patent Assistance
  • World Without Genocide

General Information

  • Consumer Information
    (ABA Required Disclosures)
  • Campus Security Report
  • Student Complaint Process
  • Academic Calendars
  • COVID-19 Information
  • Civic Engagement
  • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
  • Department/Office Contacts
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • Directions, Maps, and Parking
  • Directories
  • Privacy Statement

Action Items

  • Ask a Question
  • Make a Gift
  • Subscribe to Email News
  • Jobs at Mitchell Hamline
  • Apply for Admission
  • Hire a Student or Graduate
  • Shop the Bookstore
  • Sexual Misconduct Policy
  • Sexual Misconduct Policy
  • ABA Required Disclosures

875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105-3076 1-888-962-5529 651-227-9171

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

© 2023 Mitchell Hamline School of Law in affiliation with Hamline University.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Linked In
  • Instagram