• Skip to global navigation
  • Skip to page content
  • Skip to section navigation
  • Skip to site index
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Menu Search
  • Home
  • About
    about

    About

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law, located in St. Paul, Minnesota offers a rigorous, practice-based experience, preparing graduates to serve clients and communities. Our motivated students study full time or part time, on-campus or partially online in the way that fits their lives.

    • Accreditation
    • Awards, Rankings, and Recognition
    • Blended Learning at Mitchell Hamline
    • Board of Trustees
    • Civic Engagement
    • History
    • Employment at Mitchell Hamline
    • Life at Mitchell Hamline
    • Notable Alumni
    • Partnerships
    • Pre-Law Programs
    • President and Dean
    • Rosalie Wahl Legal Practice Center
    • Affiliation with Hamline University
  • Academics
    academics

    Academics

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law

    Academics

    Academics
    • A degree that prepares you for practice
    • J.D. Enrollment Options
    • Centers and Institutes
    • LL.M. and Other Degree Programs
    • Journals and Law Reviews
    • Study Abroad
    • Non-Degree Certificates
  • Prospective J.D. Students
    prospective-j-d-students

    Prospective J.D. Students

    Learn about the application process and connect with our Admissions team.

    • Admissions Materials
    • Admissions Team
    • Applying
    • Frequent Questions
    • Licensure
    • Student Profile
    • Tuition and Financing
    • Connect with Mitchell Hamline
    • Yellow Ribbon Law School
    • ABA Required Disclosures
    • Employment Summary Reports
  • Faculty
    faculty

    Faculty

    Faculty
    • Faculty and Academic Deans
    • Board of Trustees
    • Senior Leadership
    • Adjunct Faculty
    • Faculty Emeritus
    • Faculty Experts Guide
    • Faculty Publications
    • Mitchell Hamline Open Access
  • Alumni
    alumni

    Alumni

    Alumni
    • Alumni Association Board
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Mentoring
    • Alumni Award Recipients
    • Elected and Appointed Officials in Minnesota
    • Notable Alumni
  • Library
    library

    Library

    Library
    • Catalog
    • Circulation
    • Computing
    • Document Delivery
    • Interlibrary Loan
    • Library Staff
    • Policies
    • Printing / Scanning / Copying
  • Giving
    giving

    Giving

    Giving
    • Impact of Giving
    • Recognition and Thanks
    • Mitchell Hamline Priorities
    • Planned Giving
    • The Annual Fund
    • Staff
  • Admitted Students
    admitted-students
    • Admitted Students 101
    • Important dates
    • Tuition and Financial Aid
    • Merit Scholarships
    • Student Resources
    • Law School Preparation
  • Current Students
    current-students
    • Academic Excellence Program
    • Bookstore
    • Career and Professional Development
    • Competitions and Moot Courts
    • Counseling Services
    • Culture and Inclusion
    • Dean of Students
    • Disability Services
    • Financial Aid
    • Information Technology Services
    • Registrar
    • Student Finances and Payroll
    • Warren E. Burger Law Library
  • Career Development
    career-development
    • Resources for Students
    • Solo and Small Firm Practice
    • Resources for Employers
    • Resources for Alumni
    • Reciprocity
    • Staff
    • Employment and Salary Reports
    • Non-Discrimination Policy
  • Faculty & Staff Web
    faculty-staff-web
    • The Summit
    • Technology Services For Faculty and Staff
  • News
    news
    • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
    • Faculty Publications
    • Media Experts Guide
    • Subscribe
  • Tech
    tech
    • Course Design and Teaching
    • Record, Broadcast, and Go Live
    • Network and Other Technical Support
    • Jenzabar One System Upgrade
    • Tech Knowledge Base
  • Email
  • Canvas
  • Office 365
  • Zoom
  • Password Reset
  • Starfish
  • VPN
  • Print (Uniflow)
  • 12twenty
  • MyMitchellHamline
  • Faculty/Staff J1 Web
  • This website

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

Civil Commitment Cases

Litigation and Policy Resource Center

  • Home
  • Center Activities
  • Center Newsletter
  • News and Notes
  • Resources and Publications
  • Civil Commitment
    • Civil Commitment Cases
    • Civil Commitment Secondary Materials
    • Civil Commitment News
  • Residency
    • Residency Cases
    • Residency Secondary Materials
    • Residency News
  • Sex Offender Registration & Notification (SORN)
    • SORN Cases
    • SORN Secondary Materials
    • SORN News

Search SOLPRC

Recent Cases

  • Hope v. Commissioner (7th Cir. 2023)

  • Does #1-9 v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2023)

  • People ex rel. Rivera v. Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility (N.Y. 2023)

  • Rick v. Harpstead (D. Minn. 2023)

  • Smith v. St. Louis County Police (Mo. 2023)

  • United States v. Castellano (4th Cir. 2023)

  • Fallen v. United States (D.C. Ct. App. 2023)

  • Montana v. Hinman (Mont. 2023)

  • Clements v. Florida (11th Cir. 2023)

  • People v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County (Cal. Ct. App. 2023)

Contact Information

Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105

Professor Eric Janus, Director

eric.janus @mitchellhamline.edu

Elena Siegel, Staff Attorney

651-695-7687

elena.siegel @mitchellhamline.edu

Recent Posts

  • SOLPRC’s Policy Brief on Sex Offense Registration and Notification (SORN) Laws
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • March 2025
    • December 2024
    • July 2024
    • April 2024
    • June 2023
    • February 2023
    • November 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2016
    • June 2013
    • June 2012
    • March 2012
    • June 2010
    • June 2008
    • June 2003
    • June 1997

    Categories

    • Civil Commitment Cases
    • Civil Commitment News
    • Civil Commitment Secondary Materials
    • News and Notes
    • Newsletters
    • Residency Cases
    • Residency News
    • Residency Secondary Materials
    • Resources and Publications
    • Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center
    • SORN Cases
    • SORN News
    • SORN Secondary Materials

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    In re Commitment of Stephenson (Wis. 2020)

    Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion holding that expert evidence was not required in order to continue to find that a petitioner met the criteria for indefinite civil detention, and that the evidence was sufficient at trial.

    In re Stoddard (Tex. 2020)

    Texas Supreme Court opinion reversing a lower court on the correct standard of review for factual insufficiency claims in SVP commitment proceedings.

    Bilal v. Geo Care (11th Cir. 2020)

    11th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion reversing in part a lower court dismissal of a civil detainee who brought a lawsuit alleging violation of his Due Process rights in connection with his transport to a court hearing and detention in a jail.

    In re Bilton (S.C. Ct. App. 2020)

    South Carolina Court of Appeals reversing the civil commitment of an individual who was committed based, at least in part, on the testimony of an expert witness discussing the results of a PPG test administered on that individual that the expert did not perform themselves.

    Tilley v. United States (D.C. Ct. App. 2020)

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals opinion striking down as facially unconstitituional the District’s first-generation sexual psychopath law.

    In re Butler (Cal. Ct. App. 2020)

    California Court of Appeal opinion finding that a 12 year trial delay in a SVP proceeding violates Due Process.

    Benitez v. Hutchens (9th Cir. 2020)

    9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversing the dismissal of a civil rights complaint, alleging that confinement in a jail as a civil committee violated constitutional rights.

    In re Bluitt (Tex. 2020)

    Texas Supreme Court decision holding that in a SVP proceeding, the right to appear at trial means physical presence.

    In re Jones (Tex. 2020)

    Texas Supreme Court opinion finding that, while it was error not to submit a jury instruction in a SVP trial informing the jury that they did not need to reach a unanimous verdict to find for the Petitioner, this error was harmless.

    In re Jones (Kan. Ct. App. 2020)

    Kansas Court of Appeals opinion reversing the dismissal of an SVP petition where expert evaluators disagreed as to whether the Appellee met the statutory criteria for commitment.

    People v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)

    California Court of Appeal affirming the dismissal of an SVP petition, where the state relied on inadmissible hearsay in the form of expert evaluator reports to meet their burden of proof.

    Meyer v. Stacken (D. Minn. 2019)

    Federal trial court in Minnesota refusing to dismiss a civil rights lawsuit alleging constitutional violations stemming from MSOP officials refusing to allow family visitations with civilly committed individual.

    Van Orden v. Stringer (8th Cir. 2019)

    8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of class-action litigation concerning Missouri’s sex offense civil commitment program in light of Karsjens.

    In re Sigler (Kan. 2019)

    Kansas Supreme Court affirming the commitment of an individual who was the subject of a second SVP petition in the wake of technical violations of his supervision, rejecting res judicata, collateral estoppel and Due Process arguments.

    Pesci v. Budz (11th Cir. 2019)

    11th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion finding that civil commitment center’s ban on committee’s publication and subsequent page-limitations did not offend First Amendment rights.

    United States v. White (4th Cir. 2019)

    4th Circuit Court of Appeals holding that district court lacked the authority to dismiss a commitment proceeding against someone who was not competent to stand trial, and that furthermore such a commitment proceeding would not offend Due Process protections.

    Thomas v. Commonwealth (Va. 2019)

    Virginia Supreme Court holding that Due Process does not require the state appoint expert witnesses for indigent respondents in the context of SVP hearings.

    Taft et al. v. Branstad (8th Cir. 2019)

    8th Circuit Opinion affirming the dismissal of an equal protection and gender discrimination claim brought by a group of civilly committed individuals in Iowa’s SOCC facility.

    Lawyer v. J.M. (N.D. 2019)

    North Dakota Supreme Court reversing a trial court finding that an individual remained sexually dangerous due to bouts of non-sexual aggression.

    Matter of Chapman (S.C. 2017)

    South Carolina Supreme Court holding that there is both a statutory and constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel in SVP proceedings.

    In re Chapman (Mass. 2019)

    Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Opinion holding that individual who state alleges meets the criteria for an SVP, but whom neither examiner concludes is an SVP, is entitled to release pending trial.

    Healey v. Spencer (1st Cir. 2014)

    1st Circuit Court of Appeals case affirming in part and reversing in part complex litigation involving Massachusetts Treatment Center, finding no Due Process violations in Appelants cases.

    People v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 2nd. Dist. 2018)

    California Court of Appeal opinion finding that right to Speedy Trial was violated in case of man who was held for 17 years without civil commitment hearing due to variety of factors.

    Willis v. Palmer (N.D. Iowa 2018)

    Civil rights lawsuit brought by individuals civilly committed in Iowa challenging constitutionality of continued detention. District court dismissed various claims in light of Karsjens decision.

    United States v. Welsh (4th Cir. 2018)

    4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that, despite underlying federal conviction being vacated, federal civil commitment order was still valid.

    United States v. Comstock (4th Cir. 2010)

    After remand from Supreme Court, Fourth Circuit addresses Due Process challenge to civil commitment evidentiary standard, holding that it is not unconstitutional in light of prior decisions distinguishing civil and criminal proceedings.

    Ireland v. Anderson (D.N.D. 2017)

    Several individuals confined to North Dakota’s hospital as sexually dangerous individuals filed § 1983 suit alleging various unconstitutional violations. In ongoing litigation, District Court has thus far ruled that state statutory scheme is facially unconstitutional in that it placed no affirmative duty on state authorities to discharge those who no longer met criteria.

    U.S. v. Comstock (US 2010)

    United States Supreme Court case, within the context of analysis of the Necessary and Proper clause, holding that federal statute with authorizes the civil commitment of persons convicted of sexual offenses is constitutional.

    McGee v. Bartow (7th Cir. 2010)

    Seventh Circuit affirming dismissal of habeas corpus petition by civilly committed individual who alleged, inter alia, that diagnoses of paraphilia and personality disorder NOS as well as failure to specifically find lack of volitional control by committing court violated constitutional rights.

    Brown v. Watters (7th Cir. 2010)

    Seventh Circuit Court of appeals affirming federal district court’s denial of writ habeas corpus from petitioner who was civilly committed as SVP in Wisconsin on the basis of diagnoses of paraphilia NOS and antisocial personality disorder.

    « Previous 1 2 3 Next »

    Topics

    Jurisdiction

    10th Cir. 11th Cir. 1st Cir. 2nd Cir. 3rd Cir. 4th Cir. 5th Cir. 6th Cir. 7th Cir. 8th Cir. 9th Cir. 9th Circuit Alabama Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut D.C. Cir. Florida Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Neb. Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas United States Supreme Court Utah

    Constitutional Issues

    10th Amendment 14th Amendment 1st Amendment 4th Amendment 5th Amendment 6th Amendment 8th Amendment Assistance of Counsel Bail Bill of Attainder Compelled Speech Double Jeopardy Due Process Equal Protection Ex Post Facto Foreign Commerce Clause Fourteenth Amendment Freedom of Association Full Faith and Credit Habeas Corpus Necessary and Proper Nondelegation Overbreadth Privileges and Immunities Procedural Due Process Right to Jury Trial Right to Parent Right to Travel Ripeness Speedy Trial Standing Substantive Due Process Takings Clause Treaty power

    Substantive Issues

    Actual Innocence Administrative exhaustion Administrative Procedures Act AEDPA Antisocial Personality Disorder Apprendi / Alleyne As-Applied AWA Burden of Proof Churches Civil Commitment Collateral Estoppel Conditions of Confinement Conditions of Release Daubert Deregistration Evidentiary Standards Expungement Extraterritorial Registration Failure to Register Familial Relationships GPS Halloween Hearsay Heck bar Homelessness Housing HUD Immigration Ineffective Assistance International Travel Internet Identifiers Internet Restrictions Jury Instructions Juvenile Registration Mental disorder Non-Sexual Offense Notification Out-of-state Offense Paraphilia Diagnosis Pardon Parole Personality Disorder Plea Agreement Plethysmograph PLRA Polygraphs Preemption Presence Restrictions Procedural Default PROTECT Act Punishment Qualified Immunity Recidivism Reclassification Res Judicata Residential Banishment Retroactive Application (Non-EPF) Revocation of Supervision Risk School Property Second / Subsequent Offense Sentencing Sexual Predator designation Sign Posting Special Needs Supervised Release SVP Tiering / Classification Tolling Transitional Release Travel Travel Restrictions Treatment Programs




    • About
    • Academics
    • Prospective Students
    • Faculty
    • Alumni
    • Library
    • Giving
    • Admitted Students
    • Current Students
    • Career Development
    • Faculty and Staff

    The Mitchell Hamline J.D.

    • In the Classroom
    • In Simulated Practice
    • In the Real World

    J.D. enrollment options

    • Full time
    • Part time, day or evening
    • Blended learning

    Specialized Degree Programs

    Journals and Law Reviews

    Study Abroad

    Centers & Institutes

    • Center for Law and Business
    • Dispute Resolution Institute
    • Health Law Institute
    • Institute to Transform Child Protection
    • Intellectual Property Institute
      • Patent Law Program
    • Native American Law and Sovereignty Institute
    • Public Health Law Center

    Certificate Programs

    Special Programs

    • Expert Witness Training Academy
    • Minnesota Justice Foundation
    • Mitchell Hamline Fellows Program
    • Office of Academic Excellence
    • Pre-Law Programs
    • Self-Help Clinic
    • Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center
    • Truth and Action
    • Upper Midwest Patent Assistance

    General Information

    • Consumer Information
      (ABA Required Disclosures)
    • Campus Security Report
    • Student Complaint Process
    • Academic Calendars
    • Civic Engagement
    • CLE, Lectures, and Conferences
    • Culture and Inclusion
    • Department/Office Contacts
    • Directions, Maps, and Parking
    • Directories
    • Privacy Statement

    Action Items

    • Ask a Question
    • Make a Gift
    • Subscribe to Email News
    • Jobs at Mitchell Hamline
    • Apply for Admission
    • Hire a Student or Graduate
    • Shop the Bookstore
    • Sexual Misconduct Policy
    • Sexual Misconduct Policy
    • ABA Required Disclosures
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Vimeo
    • Linked In
    • Instagram

    875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105-3076 1-888-962-5529 651-227-9171

    Mitchell Hamline School of Law

    © 2025 Mitchell Hamline School of Law in affiliation with Hamline University.

    Building hours
    Monday–Friday: 7:30 am–10:30 pm
    Saturday–Sunday: 9:00 am–4:00 pm